Sanction Lists - United States
The United States enforces various sanctions programs to safeguard national security and uphold foreign policy objectives. Key among these is the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN) List, managed by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), which includes individuals and entities involved in activities such as terrorism, narcotics trafficking, and those affiliated with sanctioned nations. Engaging in transactions with SDNs is generally prohibited for U.S. persons. Additionally, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Entity List identifies foreign parties restricted from receiving specific U.S. exports due to national security or foreign policy concerns.
Other regions
Beyond federal-level sanctions, compliance checks also extend to State-level Gaming Commission lists, which track individuals barred from the gaming industry due to regulatory violations, and State-level Medical Sanctions lists, which identify healthcare professionals subject to disciplinary actions. We also provide access to the IRS Exempt Organizations list, ensuring businesses and donors verify the legitimacy of tax-exempt entities. Additionally, our database includes Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs), highlighting individuals in high-risk government roles to help businesses mitigate financial and reputational risks.
Compliance with these sanctions and regulatory lists is essential for businesses to avoid legal repercussions, ensure due diligence, and maintain ethical operations. These results are from the official list of the publishing organization.
Required Fields: Legal Name
Returns: The details from each list are provided. Details very by list as each organization provides different data elements.
United States
Sanctions
Chinese Military Companies Sanctions (1260H)
The Chinese Military Companies Sanctions (1260H) list is issued by the US Government as part of its strategic measures to restrict trade and financial activities with Chinese companies that are linked to the Chinese military or pose national security concerns. Verifying your transactions against this list is essential because it ensures that your organization does not inadvertently engage with entities that are deemed to undermine US security interests, thereby helping you avoid significant legal and financial penalties. This proactive screening not only safeguards your business reputation but also reinforces a robust compliance framework in the increasingly complex landscape of international trade and investment.
US OFAC Consolidated (non-SDN) List
The US OFAC Consolidated (non-SDN) List is issued by the US Office of Foreign Assets Control as part of its broader sanctions program to compile a comprehensive list of individuals, entities, and organizations that are subject to various restrictions, but not formally designated as Specially Designated Nationals (SDNs). Verifying against this list is important because it helps ensure that your organization does not engage in transactions with parties that, while not on the SDN List, still pose significant risks due to their involvement in activities that may undermine US national security or foreign policy interests. This due diligence not only helps you maintain compliance with US sanctions regulations and avoid potential legal and financial penalties, but also protects your business reputation and supports a robust global risk management strategy.
US OFAC Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List
The US OFAC Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List is issued by the US Office of Foreign Assets Control, a division of the US Department of the Treasury, to identify individuals, entities, and organizations that are subject to economic sanctions due to their involvement in activities such as terrorism, narcotics trafficking, or other threats to national security. Verifying against this list is crucial because it helps ensure that your organization does not inadvertently engage with or fund these high-risk parties, thereby maintaining compliance with US sanctions regulations, avoiding significant legal and financial penalties, and safeguarding your business’s reputation and operational integrity in the global marketplace.
US State Department Cuba Sanctions
The US State Department Cuba Sanctions list is maintained by the US State Department as part of its sanctions policy against Cuba, identifying individuals, entities, and organizations that are subject to specific restrictions. Verifying against this list is critical to ensure that your organization does not engage in transactions with parties that could compromise compliance with US foreign policy and sanctions regulations related to Cuba. This careful screening helps protect your business from potential legal and financial penalties, safeguards your reputation, and reinforces a robust compliance framework in international trade and financial operations.
US Trade Consolidated Screening List (CSL)
The US Trade Consolidated Screening List (CSL) is a comprehensive resource that aggregates multiple sanctions and restricted party lists from various US government agencies, streamlining the process of trade screening. Verifying your transactions against the CSL is crucial because it helps ensure that your business does not inadvertently engage with entities or individuals subject to trade restrictions, thereby maintaining compliance with US trade regulations. This diligence not only protects your organization from potential legal and financial penalties but also upholds your reputation in a highly regulated global trade environment.
Crime
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Most Wanted Fugitives
The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Most Wanted Fugitives list is maintained by ICE to identify individuals who are actively sought for serious criminal activities, including immigration and customs violations. Verifying your transactions against this list is essential to ensure that your organization does not engage with high-risk individuals, which could expose you to legal liabilities and reputational damage. Regular screening helps maintain robust compliance with U.S. law enforcement standards and safeguards your business by preventing inadvertent support of illicit activities.
US DEA Fugitives
The US DEA Fugitives list, maintained by the US Drug Enforcement Administration, identifies individuals sought for drug-related offenses and other serious criminal activities. Verifying transactions against this list is critical to ensure that your organization does not inadvertently engage with high-risk individuals, thereby avoiding potential legal repercussions and reputational harm. Regular screening not only supports regulatory compliance but also reinforces your commitment to ethical business practices and protects your financial operations from inadvertently facilitating illicit activities.
US FBI Most Wanted
The US FBI Most Wanted list is maintained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation to highlight individuals considered dangerous fugitives who are wanted for serious crimes such as terrorism, violent offenses, and other high-profile criminal activities. Verifying your transactions against this list is critical because it helps ensure that your organization does not inadvertently process payments for persons who pose significant risks to public safety and could be subject to intense law enforcement scrutiny. This proactive screening supports legal compliance, mitigates potential financial and reputational harm, and demonstrates your commitment to preventing the facilitation of criminal activities.
US FCC Covered List
The U.S. FCC Covered List is maintained by the Federal Communications Commission to identify entities and individuals that are subject to regulatory restrictions or enforcement actions within the communications industry. Verifying your transactions against this list is important because it helps ensure that you do not inadvertently engage with parties under FCC sanctions or oversight, thereby protecting your organization from potential legal and financial penalties. Regular screening against the FCC Covered List supports your compliance efforts and safeguards your business reputation in a highly regulated sector.
US Secret Service Most Wanted Fugitives
The U.S. Secret Service Most Wanted Fugitives list is maintained by the U.S. Secret Service to identify individuals who pose significant threats due to their involvement in high-profile criminal activities such as fraud, counterfeiting, and other crimes that jeopardize the nation’s financial and security interests. Regularly screening your transactions against this list is crucial because it helps ensure that your organization does not inadvertently engage with these high-risk individuals, thereby preventing potential legal liabilities, financial penalties, and damage to your reputation. Proactive compliance with this list is a key component of a robust risk management strategy in today’s complex regulatory environment.
Cryptocurrency
ransomwhe.re ransomware addresses
The ransomwhe.re ransomware addresses list aggregates digital addresses flagged as associated with ransomware attacks and helps identify suspicious outgoing payments to these addresses.
US FBI Lazarus Group Crypto Wallets
The US FBI Lazarus Group Crypto Wallets list is maintained by the FBI to track cryptocurrency wallet addresses linked to the Lazarus Group, a cybercriminal organization known for its involvement in hacking, cryptocurrency theft, and other illicit financial activities. Verifying your crypto transactions against this list is essential to ensure that your organization does not inadvertently transfer funds to wallets associated with these high-risk actors, thereby avoiding significant legal and financial consequences. Regular screening against this list helps protect your business’s reputation, ensures compliance with federal regulations, and prevents your operations from inadvertently facilitating criminal activities in the digital asset space.
Financial
US FDIC Failed Banks
The US FDIC Failed Banks list is maintained by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and provides information on banks that have ceased operations due to insolvency or other financial failures. Verifying your outgoing payments against this list is crucial because it helps ensure that you do not inadvertently send funds to institutions that are no longer operating, thereby avoiding potential financial loss, administrative complications, and reputational risks.
US Federal Reserve Enforcement Actions
The US Federal Reserve Enforcement Actions list is maintained by the Federal Reserve to document enforcement actions taken against financial institutions that have violated regulatory standards. Verifying your outgoing payments against this list is crucial because it helps ensure that you do not inadvertently engage in transactions with institutions that have been penalized for non-compliance, thereby protecting your organization from potential legal liabilities, financial losses, and reputational damage. Regular screening against this list reinforces your commitment to robust risk management and compliance with federal regulations.
US FinCEN 311 and 9714 Special Measures
The US FinCEN 311 and 9714 Special Measures list is maintained by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) to identify individuals and entities that warrant heightened scrutiny due to elevated risks of money laundering, terrorism financing, or other illicit financial activities. Verifying your transactions against these special measures is essential because it helps ensure that your organization does not inadvertently process payments that could facilitate financial crimes, thereby protecting you from regulatory penalties, legal repercussions, and reputational damage. Regular screening demonstrates a robust compliance framework and proactive risk management in today's increasingly complex financial environment.
US FINRA Enforcement Actions
The US FINRA Enforcement Actions list is maintained by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and details enforcement measures against firms and individuals found in violation of securities regulations and industry standards. Verifying your transactions against this list is crucial because it helps ensure that your organization does not engage with parties subject to regulatory sanctions or disciplinary actions, thereby minimizing legal risks, potential financial losses, and reputational harm. Regular screening against FINRA’s enforcement actions underscores your commitment to maintaining a robust compliance program and upholding the highest standards of integrity in the financial marketplace.
Gaming
State-level Gaming Commission lists are maintained by state gaming regulatory authorities to identify and exclude banned patrons and companies from participating in the gaming industry. These lists serve as critical tools for ensuring compliance with local gaming regulations by screening out individuals or entities that have previously engaged in fraudulent activities, violated gaming laws, or otherwise posed a risk to the integrity of gaming operations. Regularly consulting these lists helps gaming operators mitigate legal and financial risks, maintain a fair and secure gaming environment, and uphold the standards required by state and federal regulatory bodies.
Colorado Division of Gaming/Limited Gaming Control Commission
The Colorado Division of Gaming/Limited Gaming Control Commission regulates licensed gaming in Colorado and maintains the state's list of people barred from its licensed gaming establishments, alongside the enforcement actions it takes against licensees. Names reach a list of this kind through criminal convictions, or through conduct a regulator judged serious enough to call the integrity of gaming into question, so a match is a documented finding by a state authority rather than an allegation. It carries the most weight if you operate in or supply the gaming industry, where dealing with an excluded person has direct licensing consequences, but the conduct behind an entry is worth understanding in any vendor relationship.
Delaware Gaming Enforcement
The Delaware Gaming Enforcement regulates licensed gaming in Delaware and maintains the state's list of people barred from its licensed gaming establishments, alongside the enforcement actions it takes against licensees. Names reach a list of this kind through criminal convictions, or through conduct a regulator judged serious enough to call the integrity of gaming into question, so a match is a documented finding by a state authority rather than an allegation. It carries the most weight if you operate in or supply the gaming industry, where dealing with an excluded person has direct licensing consequences, but the conduct behind an entry is worth understanding in any vendor relationship.
Florida Gaming Control Commission
The Florida Gaming Control Commission regulates licensed gaming in Florida and maintains the state's list of people barred from its licensed gaming establishments, alongside the enforcement actions it takes against licensees. Names reach a list of this kind through criminal convictions, or through conduct a regulator judged serious enough to call the integrity of gaming into question, so a match is a documented finding by a state authority rather than an allegation. It carries the most weight if you operate in or supply the gaming industry, where dealing with an excluded person has direct licensing consequences, but the conduct behind an entry is worth understanding in any vendor relationship.
Illinois Gaming Board
The Illinois Gaming Board regulates licensed gaming in Illinois and maintains the state's list of people barred from its licensed gaming establishments, alongside the enforcement actions it takes against licensees. Names reach a list of this kind through criminal convictions, or through conduct a regulator judged serious enough to call the integrity of gaming into question, so a match is a documented finding by a state authority rather than an allegation. It carries the most weight if you operate in or supply the gaming industry, where dealing with an excluded person has direct licensing consequences, but the conduct behind an entry is worth understanding in any vendor relationship.
Indiana Gaming Commission
The Indiana Gaming Commission regulates licensed gaming in Indiana and maintains the state's list of people barred from its licensed gaming establishments, alongside the enforcement actions it takes against licensees. Names reach a list of this kind through criminal convictions, or through conduct a regulator judged serious enough to call the integrity of gaming into question, so a match is a documented finding by a state authority rather than an allegation. It carries the most weight if you operate in or supply the gaming industry, where dealing with an excluded person has direct licensing consequences, but the conduct behind an entry is worth understanding in any vendor relationship.
Kansas Racing & Gaming Commission
The Kansas Racing & Gaming Commission regulates licensed gaming in Kansas and maintains the state's list of people barred from its licensed gaming establishments, alongside the enforcement actions it takes against licensees. Names reach a list of this kind through criminal convictions, or through conduct a regulator judged serious enough to call the integrity of gaming into question, so a match is a documented finding by a state authority rather than an allegation. It carries the most weight if you operate in or supply the gaming industry, where dealing with an excluded person has direct licensing consequences, but the conduct behind an entry is worth understanding in any vendor relationship.
Maine Gambling Control Unit
The Maine Gambling Control Unit regulates licensed gaming in Maine and maintains the state's list of people barred from its licensed gaming establishments, alongside the enforcement actions it takes against licensees. Names reach a list of this kind through criminal convictions, or through conduct a regulator judged serious enough to call the integrity of gaming into question, so a match is a documented finding by a state authority rather than an allegation. It carries the most weight if you operate in or supply the gaming industry, where dealing with an excluded person has direct licensing consequences, but the conduct behind an entry is worth understanding in any vendor relationship.
Massachusetts Gaming Commission
The Massachusetts Gaming Commission regulates licensed gaming in Massachusetts and maintains the state's list of people barred from its licensed gaming establishments, alongside the enforcement actions it takes against licensees. Names reach a list of this kind through criminal convictions, or through conduct a regulator judged serious enough to call the integrity of gaming into question, so a match is a documented finding by a state authority rather than an allegation. It carries the most weight if you operate in or supply the gaming industry, where dealing with an excluded person has direct licensing consequences, but the conduct behind an entry is worth understanding in any vendor relationship.
Michigan Gaming Control Board
The Michigan Gaming Control Board regulates licensed gaming in Michigan and maintains the state's list of people barred from its licensed gaming establishments, alongside the enforcement actions it takes against licensees. Names reach a list of this kind through criminal convictions, or through conduct a regulator judged serious enough to call the integrity of gaming into question, so a match is a documented finding by a state authority rather than an allegation. It carries the most weight if you operate in or supply the gaming industry, where dealing with an excluded person has direct licensing consequences, but the conduct behind an entry is worth understanding in any vendor relationship.
Mississippi Gaming Commission
The Mississippi Gaming Commission regulates licensed gaming in Mississippi and maintains the state's list of people barred from its licensed gaming establishments, alongside the enforcement actions it takes against licensees. Names reach a list of this kind through criminal convictions, or through conduct a regulator judged serious enough to call the integrity of gaming into question, so a match is a documented finding by a state authority rather than an allegation. It carries the most weight if you operate in or supply the gaming industry, where dealing with an excluded person has direct licensing consequences, but the conduct behind an entry is worth understanding in any vendor relationship.
Missouri Gaming Commission
The Missouri Gaming Commission regulates licensed gaming in Missouri and maintains the state's list of people barred from its licensed gaming establishments, alongside the enforcement actions it takes against licensees. Names reach a list of this kind through criminal convictions, or through conduct a regulator judged serious enough to call the integrity of gaming into question, so a match is a documented finding by a state authority rather than an allegation. It carries the most weight if you operate in or supply the gaming industry, where dealing with an excluded person has direct licensing consequences, but the conduct behind an entry is worth understanding in any vendor relationship.
Nevada Gaming Control Board/Nevada Gaming Commission
The Nevada Gaming Control Board/Nevada Gaming Commission regulates licensed gaming in Nevada and maintains the state's list of people barred from its licensed gaming establishments, alongside the enforcement actions it takes against licensees. Names reach a list of this kind through criminal convictions, or through conduct a regulator judged serious enough to call the integrity of gaming into question, so a match is a documented finding by a state authority rather than an allegation. It carries the most weight if you operate in or supply the gaming industry, where dealing with an excluded person has direct licensing consequences, but the conduct behind an entry is worth understanding in any vendor relationship.
New Jersey Casino Control Commission
The New Jersey Casino Control Commission regulates licensed gaming in New Jersey and maintains the state's list of people barred from its licensed gaming establishments, alongside the enforcement actions it takes against licensees. Names reach a list of this kind through criminal convictions, or through conduct a regulator judged serious enough to call the integrity of gaming into question, so a match is a documented finding by a state authority rather than an allegation. It carries the most weight if you operate in or supply the gaming industry, where dealing with an excluded person has direct licensing consequences, but the conduct behind an entry is worth understanding in any vendor relationship.
New Mexico Gaming Control Board
The New Mexico Gaming Control Board regulates licensed gaming in New Mexico and maintains the state's list of people barred from its licensed gaming establishments, alongside the enforcement actions it takes against licensees. Names reach a list of this kind through criminal convictions, or through conduct a regulator judged serious enough to call the integrity of gaming into question, so a match is a documented finding by a state authority rather than an allegation. It carries the most weight if you operate in or supply the gaming industry, where dealing with an excluded person has direct licensing consequences, but the conduct behind an entry is worth understanding in any vendor relationship.
Ohio Casino Control Commission
The Ohio Casino Control Commission regulates licensed gaming in Ohio and maintains the state's list of people barred from its licensed gaming establishments, alongside the enforcement actions it takes against licensees. Names reach a list of this kind through criminal convictions, or through conduct a regulator judged serious enough to call the integrity of gaming into question, so a match is a documented finding by a state authority rather than an allegation. It carries the most weight if you operate in or supply the gaming industry, where dealing with an excluded person has direct licensing consequences, but the conduct behind an entry is worth understanding in any vendor relationship.
Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board
The Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board regulates licensed gaming in Pennsylvania and maintains the state's list of people barred from its licensed gaming establishments, alongside the enforcement actions it takes against licensees. Names reach a list of this kind through criminal convictions, or through conduct a regulator judged serious enough to call the integrity of gaming into question, so a match is a documented finding by a state authority rather than an allegation. It carries the most weight if you operate in or supply the gaming industry, where dealing with an excluded person has direct licensing consequences, but the conduct behind an entry is worth understanding in any vendor relationship.
South Dakota Commission on Gaming
The South Dakota Commission on Gaming regulates licensed gaming in South Dakota and maintains the state's list of people barred from its licensed gaming establishments, alongside the enforcement actions it takes against licensees. Names reach a list of this kind through criminal convictions, or through conduct a regulator judged serious enough to call the integrity of gaming into question, so a match is a documented finding by a state authority rather than an allegation. It carries the most weight if you operate in or supply the gaming industry, where dealing with an excluded person has direct licensing consequences, but the conduct behind an entry is worth understanding in any vendor relationship.
Medical Sanctions
State level Medical Sanctions lists are maintained by various state regulatory agencies—such as state medical boards and health departments—to identify healthcare providers, facilities, or professionals who have been sanctioned for misconduct, malpractice, or other violations of medical regulations. Regularly screening your engagements against these lists is essential to ensure that your organization does not inadvertently collaborate with or employ providers who pose legal, financial, or reputational risks. This due diligence not only helps maintain compliance with state regulations but also upholds the integrity and safety of your operations in the healthcare sector.
Alabama Board of Medical Examiners & Medical Licensure Commission
The Alabama Board of Medical Examiners & Medical Licensure Commission licenses and oversees medical practitioners in Alabama and publishes the disciplinary actions it takes against them, including suspensions, revocations, surrendered licences and restrictions on practice. Checking a name here tells you whether the person you are about to engage or pay is authorised to practise and whether the board has acted against them, which is not something a licence number on its own will reveal. Screening at onboarding and re-screening periodically also catches actions taken after a working relationship has already begun.
Alaska Medical Assistance Excluded Provider List
The Alaska Medical Assistance Excluded Provider List is published by Alaska's Medicaid program and names the providers, suppliers and individuals barred from participating in it after being terminated, excluded or sanctioned. Services ordered, referred or rendered by an excluded party are not payable, and employing or contracting with one exposes you to recovered payments and civil monetary penalties, so a match here has immediate financial consequences rather than being merely informational. Providers are generally expected to screen employees and contractors at hire or contracting and monthly thereafter, and a dated record of each check is what demonstrates that you did.
Arizona Board of Osteopathic Examiners
The Arizona Board of Osteopathic Examiners licenses and oversees medical practitioners in Arizona and publishes the disciplinary actions it takes against them, including suspensions, revocations, surrendered licences and restrictions on practice. Checking a name here tells you whether the person you are about to engage or pay is authorised to practise and whether the board has acted against them, which is not something a licence number on its own will reveal. Screening at onboarding and re-screening periodically also catches actions taken after a working relationship has already begun.
Arkansas State Medical Board
The Arkansas State Medical Board licenses and oversees medical practitioners in Arkansas and publishes the disciplinary actions it takes against them, including suspensions, revocations, surrendered licences and restrictions on practice. Checking a name here tells you whether the person you are about to engage or pay is authorised to practise and whether the board has acted against them, which is not something a licence number on its own will reveal. Screening at onboarding and re-screening periodically also catches actions taken after a working relationship has already begun.
California Department of Health Care Services
The California Department of Health Care Services publishes the practitioners and entities it has sanctioned, excluded or taken adverse action against in connection with the health programs and professions it oversees in California. Publicly funded programs will not pay for services connected to an excluded party, and engaging one can lead to recovered payments and penalties, so a match has practical consequences for anyone billing or subcontracting in this sector. Screening before you contract and at regular intervals afterwards keeps those parties out of your vendor file and evidences the diligence you carried out.
Colorado Medicaid Terminated Provider List
The Colorado Medicaid Terminated Provider List is published by Colorado's Medicaid program and names the providers, suppliers and individuals barred from participating in it after being terminated, excluded or sanctioned. Services ordered, referred or rendered by an excluded party are not payable, and employing or contracting with one exposes you to recovered payments and civil monetary penalties, so a match here has immediate financial consequences rather than being merely informational. Providers are generally expected to screen employees and contractors at hire or contracting and monthly thereafter, and a dated record of each check is what demonstrates that you did.
Delaware Division of Professional Regulation
The Delaware Division of Professional Regulation licenses professionals across a range of regulated occupations in Delaware and publishes the disciplinary actions taken against them, including suspensions, revocations and conditions placed on a licence. A match tells you a regulator has formally acted against the person or firm you are considering, which is worth knowing before you rely on their licensed status or list them as qualified. Screening at onboarding and again at intervals catches actions taken after the relationship began, which is when most of them happen.
Florida Department of Health
The Florida Department of Health publishes the practitioners and entities it has sanctioned, excluded or taken adverse action against in connection with the health programs and professions it oversees in Florida. Publicly funded programs will not pay for services connected to an excluded party, and engaging one can lead to recovered payments and penalties, so a match has practical consequences for anyone billing or subcontracting in this sector. Screening before you contract and at regular intervals afterwards keeps those parties out of your vendor file and evidences the diligence you carried out.
Georgia Healthcare provider exclusions
The Georgia Healthcare provider exclusions is published by Georgia's Medicaid program and names the providers, suppliers and individuals barred from participating in it after being terminated, excluded or sanctioned. Services ordered, referred or rendered by an excluded party are not payable, and employing or contracting with one exposes you to recovered payments and civil monetary penalties, so a match here has immediate financial consequences rather than being merely informational. Providers are generally expected to screen employees and contractors at hire or contracting and monthly thereafter, and a dated record of each check is what demonstrates that you did.
Health and Human Services Inspector General Exclusions
The Health and Human Services Inspector General Exclusions list is maintained by the relevant Inspector General’s office and is used to identify individuals and entities that are barred from participating in federal programs due to misconduct or failure to meet regulatory standards. Verifying transactions or engagements against this list is important because it helps ensure that your organization does not inadvertently associate with excluded parties, thereby avoiding legal and financial repercussions, and maintaining the integrity and compliance of your operations.
Illinois OIG Provider Sanctions
The Illinois OIG Provider Sanctions is published by Illinois's Medicaid program and names the providers, suppliers and individuals barred from participating in it after being terminated, excluded or sanctioned. Services ordered, referred or rendered by an excluded party are not payable, and employing or contracting with one exposes you to recovered payments and civil monetary penalties, so a match here has immediate financial consequences rather than being merely informational. Providers are generally expected to screen employees and contractors at hire or contracting and monthly thereafter, and a dated record of each check is what demonstrates that you did.
Indiana Medical Sanctions
The Indiana Medical Sanctions is published by Indiana's Medicaid program and names the providers, suppliers and individuals barred from participating in it after being terminated, excluded or sanctioned. Services ordered, referred or rendered by an excluded party are not payable, and employing or contracting with one exposes you to recovered payments and civil monetary penalties, so a match here has immediate financial consequences rather than being merely informational. Providers are generally expected to screen employees and contractors at hire or contracting and monthly thereafter, and a dated record of each check is what demonstrates that you did.
Iowa Medicaid Terminated Provider List
The Iowa Medicaid Terminated Provider List is published by Iowa's Medicaid program and names the providers, suppliers and individuals barred from participating in it after being terminated, excluded or sanctioned. Services ordered, referred or rendered by an excluded party are not payable, and employing or contracting with one exposes you to recovered payments and civil monetary penalties, so a match here has immediate financial consequences rather than being merely informational. Providers are generally expected to screen employees and contractors at hire or contracting and monthly thereafter, and a dated record of each check is what demonstrates that you did.
Kansas Medicaid Terminated Provider List
The Kansas Medicaid Terminated Provider List is published by Kansas's Medicaid program and names the providers, suppliers and individuals barred from participating in it after being terminated, excluded or sanctioned. Services ordered, referred or rendered by an excluded party are not payable, and employing or contracting with one exposes you to recovered payments and civil monetary penalties, so a match here has immediate financial consequences rather than being merely informational. Providers are generally expected to screen employees and contractors at hire or contracting and monthly thereafter, and a dated record of each check is what demonstrates that you did.
Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure
The Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure licenses and oversees medical practitioners in Kentucky and publishes the disciplinary actions it takes against them, including suspensions, revocations, surrendered licences and restrictions on practice. Checking a name here tells you whether the person you are about to engage or pay is authorised to practise and whether the board has acted against them, which is not something a licence number on its own will reveal. Screening at onboarding and re-screening periodically also catches actions taken after a working relationship has already begun.
Louisiana Department of Health
The Louisiana Department of Health publishes the practitioners and entities it has sanctioned, excluded or taken adverse action against in connection with the health programs and professions it oversees in Louisiana. Publicly funded programs will not pay for services connected to an excluded party, and engaging one can lead to recovered payments and penalties, so a match has practical consequences for anyone billing or subcontracting in this sector. Screening before you contract and at regular intervals afterwards keeps those parties out of your vendor file and evidences the diligence you carried out.
Maine Board of Licensure in Medicine
The Maine Board of Licensure in Medicine licenses and oversees medical practitioners in Maine and publishes the disciplinary actions it takes against them, including suspensions, revocations, surrendered licences and restrictions on practice. Checking a name here tells you whether the person you are about to engage or pay is authorised to practise and whether the board has acted against them, which is not something a licence number on its own will reveal. Screening at onboarding and re-screening periodically also catches actions taken after a working relationship has already begun.
Maryland Board of Physicians
The Maryland Board of Physicians licenses and oversees medical practitioners in Maryland and publishes the disciplinary actions it takes against them, including suspensions, revocations, surrendered licences and restrictions on practice. Checking a name here tells you whether the person you are about to engage or pay is authorised to practise and whether the board has acted against them, which is not something a licence number on its own will reveal. Screening at onboarding and re-screening periodically also catches actions taken after a working relationship has already begun.
Massachusetts Suspensions and Exclusions
The Massachusetts Suspensions and Exclusions is published by Massachusetts's Medicaid program and names the providers, suppliers and individuals barred from participating in it after being terminated, excluded or sanctioned. Services ordered, referred or rendered by an excluded party are not payable, and employing or contracting with one exposes you to recovered payments and civil monetary penalties, so a match here has immediate financial consequences rather than being merely informational. Providers are generally expected to screen employees and contractors at hire or contracting and monthly thereafter, and a dated record of each check is what demonstrates that you did.
Michigan Medicaid Sanctioned Provider List
The Michigan Medicaid Sanctioned Provider List is published by Michigan's Medicaid program and names the providers, suppliers and individuals barred from participating in it after being terminated, excluded or sanctioned. Services ordered, referred or rendered by an excluded party are not payable, and employing or contracting with one exposes you to recovered payments and civil monetary penalties, so a match here has immediate financial consequences rather than being merely informational. Providers are generally expected to screen employees and contractors at hire or contracting and monthly thereafter, and a dated record of each check is what demonstrates that you did.
Minnesota Board of Medical Practice
The Minnesota Board of Medical Practice licenses and oversees medical practitioners in Minnesota and publishes the disciplinary actions it takes against them, including suspensions, revocations, surrendered licences and restrictions on practice. Checking a name here tells you whether the person you are about to engage or pay is authorised to practise and whether the board has acted against them, which is not something a licence number on its own will reveal. Screening at onboarding and re-screening periodically also catches actions taken after a working relationship has already begun.
Mississippi Medicaid Terminated Provider List
The Mississippi Medicaid Terminated Provider List is published by Mississippi's Medicaid program and names the providers, suppliers and individuals barred from participating in it after being terminated, excluded or sanctioned. Services ordered, referred or rendered by an excluded party are not payable, and employing or contracting with one exposes you to recovered payments and civil monetary penalties, so a match here has immediate financial consequences rather than being merely informational. Providers are generally expected to screen employees and contractors at hire or contracting and monthly thereafter, and a dated record of each check is what demonstrates that you did.
Missouri Department of Social Services
The Missouri Department of Social Services publishes the practitioners and entities it has sanctioned, excluded or taken adverse action against in connection with the health programs and professions it oversees in Missouri. Publicly funded programs will not pay for services connected to an excluded party, and engaging one can lead to recovered payments and penalties, so a match has practical consequences for anyone billing or subcontracting in this sector. Screening before you contract and at regular intervals afterwards keeps those parties out of your vendor file and evidences the diligence you carried out.
Montana Medicaid Excluded and Terminated Providers
The Montana Medicaid Excluded and Terminated Providers is published by Montana's Medicaid program and names the providers, suppliers and individuals barred from participating in it after being terminated, excluded or sanctioned. Services ordered, referred or rendered by an excluded party are not payable, and employing or contracting with one exposes you to recovered payments and civil monetary penalties, so a match here has immediate financial consequences rather than being merely informational. Providers are generally expected to screen employees and contractors at hire or contracting and monthly thereafter, and a dated record of each check is what demonstrates that you did.
Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services
The Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services publishes the practitioners and entities it has sanctioned, excluded or taken adverse action against in connection with the health programs and professions it oversees in Nebraska. Publicly funded programs will not pay for services connected to an excluded party, and engaging one can lead to recovered payments and penalties, so a match has practical consequences for anyone billing or subcontracting in this sector. Screening before you contract and at regular intervals afterwards keeps those parties out of your vendor file and evidences the diligence you carried out.
Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners
The Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners licenses and oversees medical practitioners in Nevada and publishes the disciplinary actions it takes against them, including suspensions, revocations, surrendered licences and restrictions on practice. Checking a name here tells you whether the person you are about to engage or pay is authorised to practise and whether the board has acted against them, which is not something a licence number on its own will reveal. Screening at onboarding and re-screening periodically also catches actions taken after a working relationship has already begun.
New Hampshire Medicaid Exclusion and Sanction List
The New Hampshire Medicaid Exclusion and Sanction List is published by New Hampshire's Medicaid program and names the providers, suppliers and individuals barred from participating in it after being terminated, excluded or sanctioned. Services ordered, referred or rendered by an excluded party are not payable, and employing or contracting with one exposes you to recovered payments and civil monetary penalties, so a match here has immediate financial consequences rather than being merely informational. Providers are generally expected to screen employees and contractors at hire or contracting and monthly thereafter, and a dated record of each check is what demonstrates that you did.
New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners
The New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners licenses and oversees medical practitioners in New Jersey and publishes the disciplinary actions it takes against them, including suspensions, revocations, surrendered licences and restrictions on practice. Checking a name here tells you whether the person you are about to engage or pay is authorised to practise and whether the board has acted against them, which is not something a licence number on its own will reveal. Screening at onboarding and re-screening periodically also catches actions taken after a working relationship has already begun.
New York State Medicaid Exclusions
The New York State Medicaid Exclusions is published by New York's Medicaid program and names the providers, suppliers and individuals barred from participating in it after being terminated, excluded or sanctioned. Services ordered, referred or rendered by an excluded party are not payable, and employing or contracting with one exposes you to recovered payments and civil monetary penalties, so a match here has immediate financial consequences rather than being merely informational. Providers are generally expected to screen employees and contractors at hire or contracting and monthly thereafter, and a dated record of each check is what demonstrates that you did.
North Carolina Excluded Providers List
The North Carolina Excluded Providers List is published by North Carolina's Medicaid program and names the providers, suppliers and individuals barred from participating in it after being terminated, excluded or sanctioned. Services ordered, referred or rendered by an excluded party are not payable, and employing or contracting with one exposes you to recovered payments and civil monetary penalties, so a match here has immediate financial consequences rather than being merely informational. Providers are generally expected to screen employees and contractors at hire or contracting and monthly thereafter, and a dated record of each check is what demonstrates that you did.
North Dakota Medicaid Terminated Provider List
The North Dakota Medicaid Terminated Provider List is published by North Dakota's Medicaid program and names the providers, suppliers and individuals barred from participating in it after being terminated, excluded or sanctioned. Services ordered, referred or rendered by an excluded party are not payable, and employing or contracting with one exposes you to recovered payments and civil monetary penalties, so a match here has immediate financial consequences rather than being merely informational. Providers are generally expected to screen employees and contractors at hire or contracting and monthly thereafter, and a dated record of each check is what demonstrates that you did.
Oklahoma Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision
The Oklahoma Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision licenses and oversees medical practitioners in Oklahoma and publishes the disciplinary actions it takes against them, including suspensions, revocations, surrendered licences and restrictions on practice. Checking a name here tells you whether the person you are about to engage or pay is authorised to practise and whether the board has acted against them, which is not something a licence number on its own will reveal. Screening at onboarding and re-screening periodically also catches actions taken after a working relationship has already begun.
Oregon State Medicaid Fraud Convictions
The Oregon State Medicaid Fraud Convictions is published by Oregon's Medicaid program and names the providers, suppliers and individuals barred from participating in it after being terminated, excluded or sanctioned. Services ordered, referred or rendered by an excluded party are not payable, and employing or contracting with one exposes you to recovered payments and civil monetary penalties, so a match here has immediate financial consequences rather than being merely informational. Providers are generally expected to screen employees and contractors at hire or contracting and monthly thereafter, and a dated record of each check is what demonstrates that you did.
Pennsylvania Medicheck list
The Pennsylvania Medicheck list is published by Pennsylvania's Medicaid program and names the providers, suppliers and individuals barred from participating in it after being terminated, excluded or sanctioned. Services ordered, referred or rendered by an excluded party are not payable, and employing or contracting with one exposes you to recovered payments and civil monetary penalties, so a match here has immediate financial consequences rather than being merely informational. Providers are generally expected to screen employees and contractors at hire or contracting and monthly thereafter, and a dated record of each check is what demonstrates that you did.
South Carolina Board of Medical Examiners
The South Carolina Board of Medical Examiners licenses and oversees medical practitioners in South Carolina and publishes the disciplinary actions it takes against them, including suspensions, revocations, surrendered licences and restrictions on practice. Checking a name here tells you whether the person you are about to engage or pay is authorised to practise and whether the board has acted against them, which is not something a licence number on its own will reveal. Screening at onboarding and re-screening periodically also catches actions taken after a working relationship has already begun.
State Medical Board of Ohio
The State Medical Board of Ohio licenses and oversees medical practitioners in Ohio and publishes the disciplinary actions it takes against them, including suspensions, revocations, surrendered licences and restrictions on practice. Checking a name here tells you whether the person you are about to engage or pay is authorised to practise and whether the board has acted against them, which is not something a licence number on its own will reveal. Screening at onboarding and re-screening periodically also catches actions taken after a working relationship has already begun.
State of Hawaii Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs
The State of Hawaii Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs licenses professionals across a range of regulated occupations in Hawaii and publishes the disciplinary actions taken against them, including suspensions, revocations and conditions placed on a licence. A match tells you a regulator has formally acted against the person or firm you are considering, which is worth knowing before you rely on their licensed status or list them as qualified. Screening at onboarding and again at intervals catches actions taken after the relationship began, which is when most of them happen.
State of Rhode Island Department of Health
The State of Rhode Island Department of Health publishes the practitioners and entities it has sanctioned, excluded or taken adverse action against in connection with the health programs and professions it oversees in Rhode Island. Publicly funded programs will not pay for services connected to an excluded party, and engaging one can lead to recovered payments and penalties, so a match has practical consequences for anyone billing or subcontracting in this sector. Screening before you contract and at regular intervals afterwards keeps those parties out of your vendor file and evidences the diligence you carried out.
Tennessee Medical Sanctions
The Tennessee Medical Sanctions is published by Tennessee's Medicaid program and names the providers, suppliers and individuals barred from participating in it after being terminated, excluded or sanctioned. Services ordered, referred or rendered by an excluded party are not payable, and employing or contracting with one exposes you to recovered payments and civil monetary penalties, so a match here has immediate financial consequences rather than being merely informational. Providers are generally expected to screen employees and contractors at hire or contracting and monthly thereafter, and a dated record of each check is what demonstrates that you did.
Vermont Department of Health
The Vermont Department of Health publishes the practitioners and entities it has sanctioned, excluded or taken adverse action against in connection with the health programs and professions it oversees in Vermont. Publicly funded programs will not pay for services connected to an excluded party, and engaging one can lead to recovered payments and penalties, so a match has practical consequences for anyone billing or subcontracting in this sector. Screening before you contract and at regular intervals afterwards keeps those parties out of your vendor file and evidences the diligence you carried out.
Washington Medical Sanctions
The Washington Medical Sanctions is published by Washington's Medicaid program and names the providers, suppliers and individuals barred from participating in it after being terminated, excluded or sanctioned. Services ordered, referred or rendered by an excluded party are not payable, and employing or contracting with one exposes you to recovered payments and civil monetary penalties, so a match here has immediate financial consequences rather than being merely informational. Providers are generally expected to screen employees and contractors at hire or contracting and monthly thereafter, and a dated record of each check is what demonstrates that you did.
West Virginia Medicaid Provider Exclusions and Terminations
The West Virginia Medicaid Provider Exclusions and Terminations is published by West Virginia's Medicaid program and names the providers, suppliers and individuals barred from participating in it after being terminated, excluded or sanctioned. Services ordered, referred or rendered by an excluded party are not payable, and employing or contracting with one exposes you to recovered payments and civil monetary penalties, so a match here has immediate financial consequences rather than being merely informational. Providers are generally expected to screen employees and contractors at hire or contracting and monthly thereafter, and a dated record of each check is what demonstrates that you did.
Wyoming Medical Sanctions
The Wyoming Medical Sanctions is published by Wyoming's Medicaid program and names the providers, suppliers and individuals barred from participating in it after being terminated, excluded or sanctioned. Services ordered, referred or rendered by an excluded party are not payable, and employing or contracting with one exposes you to recovered payments and civil monetary penalties, so a match here has immediate financial consequences rather than being merely informational. Providers are generally expected to screen employees and contractors at hire or contracting and monthly thereafter, and a dated record of each check is what demonstrates that you did.
Other
Business Identifier Code (BIC) Reference Data
The Business Identifier Code (BIC) Reference Data is a standardized database that provides unique codes for financial institutions around the world, enabling precise identification during international transactions. Regularly verifying your transactions against BIC data is essential to ensure that funds are accurately routed to the intended recipient, thereby reducing the risk of errors, fraud, and non-compliance with regulatory standards. This robust screening process enhances transparency, improves the reliability of financial reporting, and supports effective risk management across global banking and trade operations.
EITI State-Owned Enterprises Database
The EITI State-Owned Enterprises Database is an authoritative resource that compiles detailed information on state-owned companies as reported under the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). Regularly screening your transactions against this database helps ensure transparency when dealing with government-controlled entities, mitigating risks and supporting robust compliance with international standards in the extractive industry sector.
ICIJ Offshore Leaks Database
The ICIJ Offshore Leaks Database, compiled by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), provides detailed information on offshore entities, shell companies, and hidden financial arrangements that have been linked to tax evasion, money laundering, and other illicit financial activities. Verifying your transactions against this database is essential to ensure that your organization does not inadvertently engage with high-risk or opaque financial structures, thereby helping to safeguard against legal and reputational risks while promoting transparency and ethical business practices in global financial operations.
INTERPOL Red Notices
The INTERPOL Red Notices list is an internationally recognized alert system maintained by INTERPOL to notify member countries about individuals who are wanted for arrest, pending extradition or similar legal actions. Regularly screening your transactions against this list is essential to ensure that your organization does not inadvertently engage with persons subject to international arrest warrants, thereby mitigating potential legal, financial, and reputational risks. This proactive approach helps maintain robust compliance and demonstrates your commitment to ethical business practices in the global marketplace.
IRS Exempt Organizations
The IRS Exempt Organizations Business Master File is published by the Internal Revenue Service and lists every organization recognized as tax-exempt under Section 501(c), giving each one's Employer Identification Number, legal name, address, subsection and deductibility codes, and ruling date. It is distributed alongside the Publication 78 data identifying organizations eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions, and the Automatic Revocation list of organizations that lost exempt status for failing to file a Form 990 series return for three consecutive years. Checking this file matters because exempt status determines your information reporting position: a payee whose exemption has been automatically revoked becomes reportable on Form 1099 and subject to backup withholding, and a deduction claimed against a revoked organization will not survive examination.
The Sentry Atlas
The Sentry Atlas is a comprehensive risk intelligence platform that aggregates data from multiple authoritative sources, offering real‑time insights into high‑risk individuals, entities, and politically exposed persons worldwide. Regularly consulting The Sentry Atlas enables your organization to proactively identify and mitigate compliance risks by monitoring changes in sanction regimes and regulatory lists. By leveraging this tool, you can safeguard your business operations against potential legal, financial, and reputational harm in an increasingly complex global environment.
UN Heads of State, Heads of Government and Ministers for Foreign Affairs
The UN Heads of State, Heads of Government and Ministers for Foreign Affairs list comprises the top political and diplomatic leaders from UN member states. Verifying your transactions and engagements against this list is critical, as dealings with such high-ranking officials can trigger additional regulatory scrutiny and potential conflicts of interest. Regular screening helps ensure that your organization maintains compliance with international legal and sanctions regimes, protects its reputation, and upholds the highest standards of ethical business practices in the realm of global diplomacy and international relations.
UN Security Council 1718 Designated Vessels List
The UN Security Council 1718 Designated Vessels List identifies maritime vessels that have been sanctioned under Resolution 1718 due to their involvement in activities that pose a threat to international peace and security, such as illicit trade or support for terrorism. Regular screening against this list is essential to ensure compliance with international maritime sanctions, thereby mitigating potential legal, financial, and reputational risks for your organization.
UN Security Council Consolidated Sanctions
The UN Security Council Consolidated Sanctions list compiles the sanctions measures imposed by the UN Security Council on individuals, entities, and countries that threaten international peace and security. Verifying your transactions against this comprehensive list is essential to ensure that your organization does not inadvertently engage with sanctioned parties, which can result in severe legal, financial, and reputational consequences. Regular screening helps maintain compliance with international law and supports robust risk management and ethical business practices in a globally interconnected marketplace.
United States Periodically Listing Updates to Management (PLUM) Reporting
The United States Periodically Listing Updates to Management (PLUM) Reporting system provides timely updates on changes to critical lists that affect compliance and risk management. By regularly reviewing PLUM reports, organizations can stay informed of regulatory adjustments and sanctioned entities, ensuring that management decisions are based on the most current data available. This proactive approach supports robust compliance practices and helps mitigate legal, financial, and reputational risks.
US Advisory on North Korean Joint Ventures
The US Advisory on North Korean Joint Ventures is issued by US authorities to inform businesses about the significant risks associated with partnering with North Korean entities. This advisory outlines the legal, financial, and reputational dangers that may arise from joint ventures in a highly sanctioned environment and emphasizes the need for rigorous due diligence. Regularly reviewing this guidance helps organizations maintain compliance with US sanctions and ensures that they avoid inadvertent engagements with high-risk partners.
US Anti-Kleptocracy and Human Rights Visa Restrictions
The US Anti-Kleptocracy and Human Rights Visa Restrictions list is issued by the US Government to restrict entry and business engagements with individuals whose activities are linked to corruption, kleptocracy, or significant human rights abuses. Verifying your transactions against this list is critical, as it helps ensure that your organization does not inadvertently engage with high-risk parties that could expose you to legal, financial, and reputational consequences. Regular screening against this list reinforces your commitment to ethical business practices and compliance with US foreign policy priorities, ultimately protecting your organization in the global marketplace.
US BIS Alleged Antiboycott Violations
This dataset records alleged violations of the US antiboycott regulations administered by the Bureau of Industry and Security at the Department of Commerce. The antiboycott rules prohibit US persons from participating in unsanctioned foreign boycotts, principally the Arab League boycott of Israel, and require reporting of boycott related requests received in the course of business. Screening against this list is important because antiboycott liability is easy to incur inadvertently through a clause in a letter of credit or shipping document, and because a counterparty with a history of transmitting boycott requests raises the likelihood you will receive one.
US BIS Denied Persons List
The US BIS Denied Persons List is maintained by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) and identifies individuals and entities that are prohibited from receiving exports, reexports, or transfers of U.S.-origin items due to violations of U.S. export control laws. Verifying your transactions against this list is crucial to avoid inadvertently engaging with parties that are subject to these restrictions, thereby mitigating significant legal, financial, and reputational risks. Regular screening ensures that your organization remains compliant with U.S. export regulations and upholds the integrity of your supply chain and global business operations.
US CBP Withhold Release Orders and Findings
The US CBP Withhold Release Orders and Findings list is maintained by U.S. Customs and Border Protection to document orders and findings that restrict the release of shipments or goods that pose potential security or compliance risks. Verifying your transactions against this list is essential to ensure that your organization does not inadvertently handle or process items flagged by CBP, thereby avoiding disruptions, legal repercussions, and reputational damage. Regular screening against this list supports compliance with U.S. import and export regulations and reinforces your commitment to secure and responsible supply chain management.
US CFTC Enforcement Actions
US CFTC Enforcement Actions are the administrative and civil proceedings brought by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission against firms and individuals for fraud, manipulation, misappropriation of customer funds, and registration violations in derivatives, futures and certain digital asset markets. Screening against this list is important because a CFTC action establishes a documented finding of market misconduct that belongs in a counterparty risk rating, and because many respondents are barred from registration or from trading on regulated venues. It is also a leading source of adverse media for commodity trading and crypto derivatives counterparties.
US Corrupt And Undemocratic Actors Report
The US Corrupt And Undemocratic Actors Report is a resource designed to identify individuals, entities, and organizations that have been implicated in corruption or activities that undermine democratic principles. Verifying your transactions against this report is critical because it helps ensure that your organization does not inadvertently engage with high-risk parties, thereby reducing potential legal, financial, and reputational risks. Regular screening against this report supports ethical business practices and compliance with international standards, ultimately safeguarding your organization in the global marketplace.
US Directorate of Defense Trade Controls AECA Debarments
The US Directorate of Defense Trade Controls AECA Debarments list is maintained by the DDTC to identify individuals, companies, and organizations that have been debarred from participating in defense-related trade under the Arms Export Control Act (AECA) due to violations of U.S. export control laws and regulations. Verifying your transactions against this list is essential because engaging with debarred parties can expose your organization to severe legal, financial, and reputational risks. Regular screening ensures that you remain compliant with U.S. export controls and maintain the integrity of your defense supply chain, thereby protecting your business from inadvertent violations and the associated penalties.
US Directorate of Defense Trade Controls Penalties & Oversight Agreements
The US Directorate of Defense Trade Controls Penalties & Oversight Agreements list is maintained by the US DDTC to document enforcement actions, penalties, and oversight agreements imposed on entities that have violated US export control regulations for defense-related items. Verifying your transactions against this list is essential because it helps ensure that your organization does not inadvertently engage with parties that are under strict enforcement measures, thereby avoiding significant legal, financial, and reputational risks. Regular screening supports a robust compliance framework, safeguards your defense supply chain, and demonstrates your commitment to adhering to US export control laws.
US FDA Clinical Investigator Disqualification Proceedings
The US FDA Clinical Investigator Disqualification Proceedings list is maintained by the Food and Drug Administration to document the disqualification of clinical investigators who have not met regulatory or ethical standards in clinical research. Regularly screening against this list is essential to ensure that your organization does not inadvertently collaborate with disqualified investigators, thereby protecting the integrity of clinical trials and minimizing legal, financial, and reputational risks.
US OCC Enforcement Actions
The US OCC Enforcement Actions list is maintained by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and details enforcement actions taken against banks and financial institutions for regulatory violations. Verifying your transactions against this list is crucial because it helps ensure that you do not inadvertently engage with institutions that have faced regulatory sanctions, thereby reducing your exposure to legal, financial, and reputational risks. Regular screening supports robust risk management and compliance with federal banking regulations, safeguarding your organization in the complex financial landscape.
US Office of Antiboycott Compliance Requester List
The US Office of Antiboycott Compliance Requester List is maintained by the US Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security and identifies entities that request or require US companies to boycott foreign products or suppliers. Verifying transactions against this list is important because engaging with such entities can expose your organization to legal and reputational risks, as US antiboycott regulations are designed to ensure fair trade practices and prevent politically motivated boycotts. Regular screening helps maintain compliance with these regulations, protecting your business from potential penalties and reinforcing ethical standards in your international trade operations.
US Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
The US Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE) list is designed to alert organizations about entities that are not registered to solicit business and may be operating outside of established regulatory frameworks. Verifying your transactions against this list is crucial because engaging with unregistered solicitors can expose your organization to legal liabilities, potential fraud, and reputational harm. Regular screening helps ensure that you maintain robust compliance practices and avoid inadvertently conducting business with parties that lack proper oversight and legitimacy.
US SAM Procurement Exclusions
The US SAM Procurement Exclusions list, maintained within the System for Award Management (SAM), identifies individuals, companies, and organizations that are prohibited from receiving federal contracts and financial assistance due to past misconduct or violations of applicable laws and regulations. Verifying your transactions and business relationships against this list is essential, as it helps prevent inadvertently engaging with parties that are excluded from government procurement, thereby protecting your organization from legal liabilities, financial penalties, and reputational damage. Regular screening supports a robust compliance program and ensures that your business maintains the integrity required to operate successfully in regulated markets.
US SEC Actions Due to Harmed Investors
The US SEC Actions Due to Harmed Investors list is maintained by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to document enforcement actions taken against firms and individuals whose misconduct has adversely affected investors. Verifying your transactions against this list is vital to ensure that your organization does not inadvertently engage with parties that have harmed investors, thereby exposing you to legal liabilities, financial risks, and reputational damage. Regular screening against this list not only supports robust compliance practices but also reinforces your commitment to upholding investor protection and maintaining trust in your business operations.
US Special Legislative Exclusions
The US Special Legislative Exclusions list identifies individuals, entities, or organizations that are specifically exempted from certain regulatory requirements or sanctions under targeted legislative provisions. Verifying your transactions against this list is essential to ensure that your organization properly accounts for these exemptions, thereby avoiding potential legal liabilities, administrative complications, and reputational risks. Regular screening helps maintain compliance with nuanced legislative mandates and supports a robust risk management framework in a complex regulatory environment.
US UFLPA Entity List
The US UFLPA Entity List is a critical component of the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, designed to identify and restrict entities believed to be involved in forced labor practices, particularly in the Xinjiang region of China. Verifying your transactions against this list is essential to ensure that your supply chain and business operations do not inadvertently engage with companies linked to human rights abuses, which could result in severe legal, financial, and reputational repercussions. Regular screening not only supports compliance with U.S. import and labor regulations but also reinforces your commitment to ethical sourcing and supply chain transparency in a global marketplace.
US Politically Exposed Persons
Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) are individuals who hold, or have held, prominent public positions or roles—such as senior government officials, high-ranking military officers, or influential public figures—and their close associates. Because of their potential influence and access to public funds, PEPs are considered higher risk for corruption, money laundering, and other financial crimes. Verifying transactions and business relationships with PEPs is essential to mitigate these risks, ensure compliance with anti-money laundering and anti-corruption regulations, and protect your organization from legal, financial, and reputational harm.
US CIA World Factbook Heads of State and Government
The US CIA World Factbook Heads of State and Government listing is compiled by the Central Intelligence Agency and names the serving heads of state, heads of government and cabinet-level officials of countries worldwide. Anyone appearing here is a politically exposed person, which does not make them ineligible but does mean that payments, ownership interests and gifts involving them attract bribery and corruption scrutiny that an ordinary counterparty would not. Screening against it at onboarding identifies the relationships that warrant enhanced due diligence and senior sign-off before money moves.
US CIA World Leaders
US CIA World Leaders is the Central Intelligence Agency's directory of serving government leaders and senior officials across national administrations. A match identifies a politically exposed person, whose involvement in a transaction raises the risk that a payment could be characterised as improper influence rather than ordinary commerce. Checking names here before onboarding lets you apply enhanced due diligence where it is actually warranted, rather than treating every foreign counterparty the same way.
US Legislators
US Legislators records the members of the United States Congress together with the state legislators serving across the individual states. Public officials at this level are politically exposed persons, and payments, consulting arrangements or ownership interests involving them carry conflict-of-interest and campaign-finance implications that need to be understood before they are entered into. Screening against this list surfaces those relationships early, while they can still be reviewed and documented.
US Members of the Congress
US Members of the Congress lists the sitting members of the United States Senate and House of Representatives. A match means the counterparty is a politically exposed person, which does not bar the relationship but does place it in the category where gifts, fees and business interests are subject to disclosure rules and public scrutiny. Identifying these names at onboarding gives your compliance and legal teams the chance to review the arrangement before it is committed to.
US Navy Leadership
US Navy Leadership records the senior officers and civilian officials holding command and executive positions within the United States Navy. Defense procurement carries specific restrictions on gifts, employment offers and financial interests involving serving officials, and a match here indicates a relationship where those rules are likely to apply. Screening against this list before engaging or paying a counterparty helps you identify procurement-integrity questions while they are still straightforward to resolve.
US State Department Senior Officials
US State Department Senior Officials lists the senior appointed and career officials serving in the United States Department of State. Anyone named here is a politically exposed person whose involvement in a transaction invites scrutiny under anti-bribery and conflict-of-interest rules, particularly where foreign business or government contracting is involved. Screening at onboarding identifies those relationships so they can be reviewed, documented and approved rather than discovered later.
Terrorism
Counter Terrorism
The Counter Terrorism Sanctions list is maintained by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) as part of its efforts to disrupt the financing and support of terrorist organizations. Verifying your transactions against this list is critical because it helps ensure that your organization does not inadvertently engage with individuals or entities that pose significant security threats and are subject to strict sanctions. Regular screening not only mitigates the risk of severe legal, financial, and reputational consequences but also reinforces your commitment to robust compliance practices and ethical business operations in the global marketplace.
US Department of State Terrorist Exclusion
The US Department of State Terrorist Exclusion list is maintained by the US Department of State to identify individuals and organizations that are barred from engaging in activities that could indirectly support terrorist activities. Verifying your transactions and business relationships against this list is crucial to ensure that your organization does not inadvertently engage with high-risk parties, thereby preventing potential legal, financial, and reputational repercussions. Regular screening demonstrates a strong commitment to compliance with US foreign policy and national security objectives, and it reinforces your organization’s efforts to promote a safe and secure global business environment.